Berniece solved the following equation: 4x − 2x + 8 = 6(x + 4) step work justification 1 2x + 8 = 6(x + 4) combine like terms 2 2x + 8 = 6x + 24 distributive property 3 −4x + 8 = 24 subtraction property of equality 4 −4x = 16 addition property of equality 5 x = −4 division property of equality which step has an incorrect justification? (make sure to type only the number of the step into the blank: 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5)

Step 4 is incorrect.

This is technically another example of the subtraction property of inequality. This is because we are subtracting 8 from both sides to get the 8 to cancel and the 24 to go down to 16. This is not addition and should not be justified as such.

y + 11 = (1/4)(x + 16)

step-by-step explanation:

no association

step-by-step explanation:

if you have eyes and you can use them efficiently you can see that it just looks like random dots like do a line of best fit and like they're so spread out it's such a weak association you might as well consider it nonexistent