In 1995, the gross domestic product (gdp) of the united states was $7,398 billion. in 2000, it was $9,817 billion. (a) develop the exponential model that represents the nation's gdp. (write your model in terms of t, where t is the number of years after 1995. let p represent the gdp in billions. round the coefficient of t to seven decimal places.) (b) use the model to predict the gdp in 2004. (the actual 2004 gdp was $11,735 billion. round your answer to the nearest whole number.)

p(0) = 7398

p(5) = 9817

p(t) is the predicted GDP in billions in t years after 1995.

a) an exponential model for p(t)

b) p(9)

There are a number of ways to write exponential models. My favorite uses the given numbers exactly, so no rounding or approximation is necessary. This version gives

... p(t) = 7398·(9817/7398)^(t/5)

Then

... p(9) = 7398·(9817/7398)^(9/5) ≈ 12,310

If you want to use e as the base of your exponential function, then the exponent multiplier in e^(kt) becomes

... k = ln(9817/7398)^(1/5) ≈ 0.0565812

so the function is

... p(t) = 7398·e^(0.0565812t)

and

... p(9) ≈ 12,310

The GDP in 2004 is predicted to be 12,310 billion.

[editorial comment] It is not surprising that the estimate is a little high. The model assumes annual growth of 5.8%, which is a little higher than the long-term average. Over the 9 years from 1995 to 2004, the average was actually 5.26%

answer: kljdcdhjbdlchjad oac apoich a

step-by-step explanation:

5=812a+9+3

step 1: simplify both sides of the equation.

5=812a+9+3

5=(812a)+(9+3)(combine like terms)

5=812a+12

5=812a+12

step 2: flip the equation.

812a+12=5

step 3: subtract 12 from both sides.

812a+12−12=5−12

812a=−7

step 4: divide both sides by 812.

812a /812 = -7/812

a= -1/116

so the answer is

a=   -1/116