Cam is a corrupt politician. nobody votes for him except those he pays to do so. it costs cam exactly 100$ to buy each vote. are cam's costs proportional to the number of votes he receives? yes or no

Hi,

This question depends on Cam's financial stability. If cam is very rich then to buy a voter for 100 bucks may not be much and can easily buy a lot of votes. Otherwise he is unable to buy a lot of votes and therefore this is highly unlikely for him to win the campaign.

I would say if he is a corrupt politician then probably haves a lot of money and can easily buy votes however he is limited to the amount of money he haves. It again depends on the number of voters.

If Cam is rich and there are not many voters: YES

If Cam is rich and there are many voters: NO

If Cam is not rich and there are not many voters: NO

If Cam is not rich and there are many voters: NO

Hope this helps.
r3t40

Ibelieve that c. recording would work best.

both graphs increase on their domain

neither graph has a y-intercept

step-by-step explanation:

the following points can be visualized easily from the graph

there is a hike in both the graphs so the graphs are increasing on their domain.x-intercept of log x and log 6x are differentthere is a vertical asymptote of both the graphs so there is no y-interceptas both the graphs are increasing so there is no horizontal asymptote