Answer asap ! will give brainliest, rating, and !

She is incorrect. The sequence is neither arithmetic nor geometric.

Why isn't it arithmetic? Because the distance from 2 to 3 is different from 3 to 5

we add 1 to go from 2 to 3

we add 2 to go from 3 to 5

Put another way,

3-2 = 1

5-3 = 2

This shows that there is no common difference. Therefore this sequence isn't arithmetic

There is no common ratio as well. Pick any term and divide by its previous term

(term2)/(term1) = 3/2 = 1.5

(term3)/(term2) = 5/3 = 1.67

(term4)/(term3) = 8/5 = 1.6

The results are close, but not the exact same every time. The inconsistent results above show there isn't any common ratio. This shows us we don't have a geometric sequence.

Note: this sequence is very close to a subset of the Fibonacci sequence (if the 12 was 13, then it would work perfect)

figure c

step-by-step explanation:

hope this .

answer:   rotate 270° clockwise about (7, 1) and reflect across the line x = 7

step-by-step explanation:

because i took test