Which statement is the correct interpretation of the inequality −2 > −3? 1 on a number line, −2 is located to the left of −3. 2 on a number line, −2 is located to the right of −3. 3 on a number line, −2 is located to the left of 0 and −3 is located to the right of 0. 4 on a number line, −2 is located to the right of 0 and −3 is located to the left of 0.

The second one.

First of all, all the options involving zero make no sense, since it is not present in the inequality.

Then, the number line has a direction, which is rightwards. This means that the numbers get bigger and bigger as you walk the line to the right.

So, if , it means that is located to the right of

55? i think maybe

step-by-step explanation:

option 2 is correct.

step-by-step explanation:

we are given two inequality equation

x+y> 5 and -3x+2y< -2

first we draw the graph of both function using t-table method

equation: x+y> 5

for x=0, y=5

for x=-5, y=0

table:

x   :   0     5

y   :   5     0

test point (0,0) , 0> 5

false

equation: -3x+2y< -2

for x=0, y=-1

for x=2, y=4

table:

x   :   0     2

y   : -1       4

test point (0,0) , 0< -2

true

now we draw the graph. see the attachment for graph.

common region would be solution set.

option 2 is correct.