subject
Mathematics, 19.07.2019 21:30 agabu38

Vance used the associative property to write (4.5m+7/8)-9 as the equivalent expression 4.5(7/8-9). did vance apply the associative property correctly? why or why not? yes, the terms with variables should be written first. yes, the terms can be regrouped and still be equivalent. no, the order of the terms should have been changed. no, the addition symbol was dropped in the second expression

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 14:40
Given the statements, "a square root of 16 is 4," and "a square root of 9 is -3," complete the following blanks with the correct truth-values. p is and q is , so the statement, "a square root of 16 is 4 or a square root of 9 is -3" is .
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:30
Anna is constructing a line segment that is congruent to another segment ab. for the construction, which tool should be used to mesure segment ab
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:00
If there are 3.281 feet in 1 meter, how many inches are in one centimeter
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:20
The radius of the circle below intersects the unit circle at (3/5,4/5). what is the approximate value of theta? 0.6 radians 1.0 radians 36.9 degrees 53.1 degrees
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Vance used the associative property to write (4.5m+7/8)-9 as the equivalent expression 4.5(7/8-9). d...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 02.10.2019 02:50
question
Mathematics, 02.10.2019 03:00
question
Mathematics, 02.10.2019 03:00