Consider the scenario below: Bob is pulled over by state police for speeding. When they check the trunk of his car, the
police find evidence that Bob is involved in illegal activities. He is arrested and charged
with violating state criminal laws.
Based on this information, which scenario explains why Bob's case eventually might be
heard in a federal court of appeals?
Bob's lawyers claim the illegal items police found in Bob's car were planted by someone else.
O Bob's lawyers argue that Bob is not a resident of the state in which he was arrested and charged,
O Bob's lawyers claim the police found evidence against Bob while conducting an unconstitutional
search and selzure,
Bob's lawyers argue that he did not cross state lines while transporting illegal goods,

Adefendant charged with driving while intoxicated pleaded not guilty and insisted on a trial. right before the trial began, he fired his attorney and decided to defend himself. at one point during opening arguments, the defendant began to act like a cat, meowing and chasing an imaginary squirrel out of the courtroom. if no one else raises the issue of the defendant's competency to stand trial, what is the responsibility of the trial judge here? a) the trial judge has no responsibility, because the defendant decided to defend himself. b) the trial judge has no responsibility, because she cannot decide whether the defendant is competent to stand trial. c) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the defendant is representinghimself.d) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the constitution obligates her to do.