Law, 20.07.2021 02:50 cathysilvestro
In a state court of general jurisdiction in State A, a debtor, who was a resident of State A, brought suit against a lender, who was an alien with permanent residency status in State B, for violation of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The lender waived personal jurisdiction. Under state procedural rules, venue was proper in the state court. The lender timely removed the action to the federal court for the Northern District of State A, which was the district in which the state court sat. The lender then timely moved to dismiss the action for improper venue, noting that, had the action initially been brought in federal court, the federal court for the Northern District of State A would not have had proper venue over this action. How should the court rule on this motion
Answers: 1
Law, 03.07.2019 15:10
Which of the following best describes the principle of informed consent as described in the belmont report? a. voluntariness, risk/benefit assessment, selection of subjects. b. comprehension, conflicts of interest, risk/benefit ratio. c. risk/benefit assessment, justification of research, comprehension. d. information, comprehension, voluntariness.
Answers: 1
Law, 16.07.2019 14:10
It's a good idea to keep in your glove box. a. a pair of sunglasses b. a pair of socks c. matches d. thumb tacks
Answers: 1
Law, 16.07.2019 23:30
When you encounter an impaired road user, you should stay a. to their side b. behind them c. ahead of them d. in their blind spot
Answers: 1
In a state court of general jurisdiction in State A, a debtor, who was a resident of State A, brough...
Chemistry, 03.03.2021 03:30
Mathematics, 03.03.2021 03:30
Chemistry, 03.03.2021 03:30
Mathematics, 03.03.2021 03:30
English, 03.03.2021 03:30
Computers and Technology, 03.03.2021 03:30
Biology, 03.03.2021 03:30
Mathematics, 03.03.2021 03:30