A gardener, a citizen of State A, sues a homeowner, a citizen of State B, in a State A federal court seeking damages for breach of contract. It would not violate the Due Process Clause of the U. S. Constitution for a State A federal court to hear the case. However, State A's long-arm statute would not grant a State A state court jurisdiction over the homeowner. Required:
Can the State A federal court exert personal jurisdiction over the homeowner?

Following are the solution to the given question:

Explanation:

The answer is "No" because, in the given scenario, the Federal Court has little ownership of the property. In line with the Rules of Civil Procedure, that's used to explains the process and how plaintiffs need to exhibit their arguments by a court or decision. In this the States, A lengthy statute needs to be applied, therefore the Federal judges apply the law of the civil procedure law.

"quid pro quo" harassment takes place when a supervisor requires sex, sexual favors, or sexual contact from an employee/job candidate as a condition of their employment. only supervisors who have the authority to make tangible employment actions (i.e. hire, fire, promote, can commit "quid pro quo" harassment.