The district court (trial court) accepted the individual defendants’ argument. What was that argument? On what reasoning did the appellate court reject that argument? If employees of a company that is violating the RCRA carry out disposal of hazardous substances in violation of the RCRA, they would presumably lose their jobs if they didn’t. What is the moral justification for applying criminal penalties to such employees (such as Hopkins and Angel)?

answer: the only person who would no is god and you would no you would have to live with this scar for the rest of your life

explanation:

there is hope for you only if you ask forgiveness but if not you shall be guilty in the sight of god

answer:

insta

explanation:

answer: the equal protection clause is a clause from the text of the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution. the clause, which took effect in 1868, provides "nor shall any state deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".