subject
Law, 22.05.2021 15:10 ladnerhailey16

Michael incorporated Erin Homes, Inc., to manufacture mobile homes. He issued himself a stock certificate for 100 shares for which he made no payment. He and his wife served as officers and directors of the organization, but, during the eight years of its existence, the corporation held only one meeting. Erin always had its own checking account, and all proceeds from the sales of mobile homes were deposited there. It filed federal income tax returns each year, using its own federal identification number. John and Thelma paid $17,500 to purchase a mobile home from Erin, but the company never delivered it to them. John and Thelma sued Erin Homes and Michael, individually. Should the court "pierce the corporate veil" and hold Michael personally liable?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Law

question
Law, 12.07.2019 10:10
What is the most common reason people do not vote?
Answers: 2
question
Law, 15.07.2019 07:10
How does the right to file a lawsuit protect people?
Answers: 3
question
Law, 15.07.2019 14:10
Most collisions caused by 16-year-old drivers tend to involve . a. a temporary physical impairment b. a willfully dangerous action c. an improper visual search
Answers: 1
question
Law, 15.07.2019 23:20
What are the ramifications of different interpretations of the relationship between loac and human right laws?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Michael incorporated Erin Homes, Inc., to manufacture mobile homes. He issued himself a stock certif...
Questions