What is the probability that the suspect was at the crime scene, based on the TLC results?
What arguments would the suspect's lawyer
make to weaken the TLC evidence?

you could ask stuff like did 1 person or a team examinant it because if 1 did it could be a false because his a dirty cop or person feeling got in the way and really it depends on the evidence if its a piece of hair at a grocery store before a muder then the lawyer could say he could of got grocery's before the muder  even happens

but lets say the find his blood the prosecutor could say the muder suspect tried to fight the attacker and lost and the defendant dose not have much he could do

finale if a muder took place in a area people cant go and a hair or blood of the suspect  the defendant could try to go from muder to trespassing with manslaughter or self defense or maby if its a very very very good lawer they could try for the person tryed to Assault the suspet and he had nowere so run so he jumped the fence and had to fight the jon/jane doe(if u dont no what that means it means a dead person that we dont no the name of) and won

hope this helps but the main thing is it depends on were are what they find

answer: uh,crime?

explanation: cause im on probation