subject
Law, 22.01.2021 01:20 sheram2010

Assume that an applicable state statute makes it a crime for a private citizen to possess a machine gun. For approximately three weeks, Officer Roy Holt had probable cause to believe that Alex Hood, a private citizen, possessed an arsenal of machine guns in his apartment. Acting on this probable cause, but without a warrant, Holt knocked on the door of Hood's apartment and asked Hood if he could come in to talk with him. Hood let Holt inside his apartment. Then, without Hood's consent, Holt began searching the entire apartment. Holt found several machine guns in the bedroom closet. He arrested Hood for an alleged violation of the statute mentioned above. In a pretrial motion, Hood's attorney asked that the court apply the exclusionary rule and suppress the evidence yielded by Holt's search of Hood's apartment. Should the evidence be suppressed (not admitted at trial)

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Law

question
Law, 03.07.2019 15:10
What does charged off as bad debt canceled by credit grantor mean?
Answers: 2
question
Law, 09.07.2019 22:10
In which system of gonvernment would states function independently of each other?
Answers: 2
question
Law, 11.07.2019 05:20
Vehicle #1 skidded 50 ft before impact with a drag factor of 0.80, how far from impact was vehicle #1 when vehicle #2 first began to accelerate from being stopped?
Answers: 2
question
Law, 16.07.2019 17:10
How long does it take to foreclose on a house
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Assume that an applicable state statute makes it a crime for a private citizen to possess a machine...
Questions