Can someone help me with this question please. Assuming that each of the following pieces of evidence is admissible, including a reliably documented chain of custody, which would NOT be useful in determining the facts of the case?
A. A photograph of the crime scene
B. Matching DNA test from blood at the scene and a hair sample from a suspect
C. An eye witness who says she thought she recognized that someone at the scene looks like the accused
D. A neighbor who says that the accused was known to have drugs when she was in high school

C

Explanation: The women wouldn’t be helpful cause she thought she saw a suspect but she didn’t cause she don’t remember. if she doesn’t remember then she would be useful at all

answer:

do you think it is fair that you get in trouble because you have you're instagram put and get in trouble. it is your social media not theirs. i am the one who has to be careful. they don't have to take care of me.

answer:

explanation:

it is often classified as either a schedule ii or schedule iii substance, making it illegal to possess for personal use or distribution. crystal meth can be ingested, injected, or smoked. it is a highly addictive substance and can lead to many different personal, medical, and legal problems.