5. According to Ronald who actually “pulled off the robbery”? 6. What story did Sosa present at his trial?
7. What were the outcomes and penalties of the two trials?
8. Why did Sosa's attorney appeal his client’s conviction?
9. During several conversations with his appellate lawyer, Eric Williams, what was the startling revelation offered by Ronald Clark?
10. What was the "hypothetical question" Attorney Eric Williams put to the bar association when he called them following his discovery of Clark’s confession?
11. What was the bar association's advice pertaining to working with the client on appeal with no previous knowledge of the prior false testimony?
12. When the Methodist minister became convinced that Ronald was telling the truth about what he had done what did he tell Ronald to do?
13. What happened to Sosa at the new trial?
14. What happened to Travis at the new trial?

What was the effect of the supreme court’s ruling in citizens united v. federal election commission? a. it removed limitations on corporate funding of political broadcasts. b. it removed all limits on campaign contributions by interest groups. c. it prohibited corporations and businesses from contributing to political campaigns. d. it prohibited interest groups from contributing to individual candidates.

Acash payment of $1 given to support a gift promise cannot support a contract. true false

John, a 34 year old father of two children, is a member of a health maintenance organization (hmo) in texas. john has made several trips to an area clinic recommended by his hmo to seek medical attention since finding blood in his bowel movements. he has been taking large amounts of aspirin for persistent headaches but did not realize that this could cause internal bleeding. john was always seen at the clinic by a physician assistant, robert m. but never by a physician. robert didn't ask john about taking any nonprescription medications. john didn't realize that he should mention his over the counter medication (aspirin) consumption. robert tells john to take an antacid preparation to control the bleeding, but does not order any tests. he tells john to return if he is not any better. two days later, john is rushed to the area emergency room with a bowel hemorrhage.1-¿what responsibility, if any, does robert have for john's emergency? 2- does the clinic have a responsibility to provide its hmo members with the services of a physician? 3- what responsibility, as a healthcare consumer, does john have for his own medical condition?