subject
Law, 24.09.2020 06:01 Simplytaylorgrenade

The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. —Alexander Hamilton,
Federalist No. 78

Which statement comes closest to summarizing the meaning of this passage?

Courts should not try to interpret the laws.
Courts should interpret laws and the Constitution.
Courts should follow the laws but not the Constitution itself.
Courts should follow the laws of the legislature.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Law

question
Law, 15.07.2019 14:10
Most collisions caused by 16-year-old drivers tend to involve . a. a temporary physical impairment b. a willfully dangerous action c. an improper visual search
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 06:10
If the traffic light is out or malfunctioning, treat it like
Answers: 2
question
Law, 16.07.2019 06:20
How can you tell that you're driving in the right direction? options are a. there is a white line on your left and a yellow line on your right. b. there are yellow lines on both sides of your vehicle. c. there is a double yellow line on your right. d. there is a yellow line on your left and a white line on your right.
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 19:20
What is the constitution of the united states
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is,...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 12.08.2020 04:01
question
Mathematics, 12.08.2020 04:01
question
Mathematics, 12.08.2020 04:01
question
Mathematics, 12.08.2020 04:01