Adia filed a case against Chang in the court at Ohio. However, Chang had never visited Ohio and had no personal ties with anyone in Ohio. Chang could successfully argue that the court: a. was in proximity to the place where Chang resides.
b. lacked personal jurisdiction.
c. was limited by subject matter jurisdiction.
d. did not have judges that would understand the languagespoken by him.

b. lacked personal jurisdiction

Explanation:

A court is said to lack personal jurisdiction when the offense or activity doesn’t take place in the location of the court or when the court isn’t situated in the state of origin of the defendant.

Ada filing the case against Chang at a court in Ohio which isn’t Chang’s state of origin and in which he has not visited before means that the court at Ohio lacks personal jurisdiction to progress with the case.

ssishua7auahwuw8uwhwh

4

8

4

10

and i oop skskskskaksksk