Does examining victim behavior when attempting to identify causes of victimization lead to victim blaming? Is is wrong to consider the role of the victim? How might considering the role of the victim in efforts to understand and explain victimization contribute to victim blaming?

Explanation

Lets say your working a serial killer case and in order to find the killer you need to study victimology. In order to do this you will have to look at the behavior of the victim, and how they play a part in the unsubs killing.  doing this does not really mean you are victim blaming, its just helping you get a better understanding on why the unsub targeted that victim.

"quid pro quo" harassment takes place when a supervisor requires sex, sexual favors, or sexual contact from an employee/job candidate as a condition of their employment. only supervisors who have the authority to make tangible employment actions (i.e. hire, fire, promote, can commit "quid pro quo" harassment.

flexjobs recently identified 14 of the most common remote job titles, spanning a wide variety of skill sets and industries.

check out these positions to see if they're right for you!

client services director.

speech language pathologist.

business development manager.

developer.

nurse.

account manager.

accountant.

writer.

explanation: