How are judicial activism and judicial review related?

A. Judicial activism defines how to interpret judicial review of constitutional law.

B. Judicial review is the underlying legal principle in judicial activism.

C. Judicial review defines the process of judicial activism in constitutional disputes

D. Judicial activism is the legal principle that defines the ability for judges to review cases.

The correct answer would most likely be A.

Explanation:

Because while judicial review mean to decide if the law/act is consistent with constitution. On the other hand judicial activism is more of a behavioral concept of the judge concerned...What im trying to say is that With the power of judicial review, the courts act as a custodian of fundamental rights

answer:

the colonists had their reasons for creating a weak central (federal) government under the articles of confederation. not only did they create a weak federal government, they restricted the powers of the state governors because they were so concerned about the leaders abusing their power.

answer:

5

explanation: he is just very beautiful