subject
Law, 21.05.2020 06:58 jamesleecy06

Nicole Tipton and Sadik Seferi owned and operated a restaurant in Iowa. Acting on a tip from the local police, agents of Immigration and Customs Enforcement executed search warrants at the restaurant and at an apartment where some restaurant workers lived. The agents discovered six undocumented aliens who worked at the restaurant and lived together. When the I-9 forms for the res- restaurant's employees were reviewed, none were found for the six aliens. They were paid in cash while other employees were paid by check. Tipton and Seferi were charged with hiring and harboring undocumented aliens. 1) What laws or regulations apply?2) What argument would you make that Tipton and Seferi were guilty of hiring and harboring illegal aliens?3) What defense could Tipton and Seferi assert that they did not know that the workers were unauthorized aliens?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Law

question
Law, 10.07.2019 07:10
Which of the following is a polynomial with roots 3,5i, and -5if(x)=x^3-3x^2+25x-75f(x)=x^3-3x^2+15x-25f(x)=x^3-15x^2+25x-75f(x)=x^3-3x^2+15x-75
Answers: 2
question
Law, 15.07.2019 09:10
Dumb question? (thats me name: ) can a stakeholder be a leader of an organization?
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 17:20
Ageneral requirement for informed consent is that no informed consent may include any exculpatory language. exculpatory language is that which waives or appears to waive any of the subject’s legal rights or releases or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence. which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of exculpatory language? a. your participation in this research is voluntary. if you choose not to participate, or change your mind later, your decision will not affect your relationship with the researcher or your right to other services that you may be eligible for. b. taking part in the research is voluntary, but if you choose to take part, you waive the right to legal redress for any research-related injuries. c. the researcher may stop you from taking part in this research without your consent if you experience side effects that make your emotional condition worse. if you become too emotionally distressed during the research, you may have to drop out. d. in the event of any distress you may have related to this research, you will be given access to appropriate resources.
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 18:30
Adefendant charged with driving while intoxicated pleaded not guilty and insisted on a trial. right before the trial began, he fired his attorney and decided to defend himself. at one point during opening arguments, the defendant began to act like a cat, meowing and chasing an imaginary squirrel out of the courtroom. if no one else raises the issue of the defendant's competency to stand trial, what is the responsibility of the trial judge here? a) the trial judge has no responsibility, because the defendant decided to defend himself. b) the trial judge has no responsibility, because she cannot decide whether the defendant is competent to stand trial. c) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the defendant is representinghimself.d) the trial judge must raise the issue of competency, because the constitution obligates her to do.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Nicole Tipton and Sadik Seferi owned and operated a restaurant in Iowa. Acting on a tip from the loc...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 23.02.2021 19:50
question
Mathematics, 23.02.2021 19:50
question
Chemistry, 23.02.2021 19:50
question
Social Studies, 23.02.2021 19:50
question
Mathematics, 23.02.2021 19:50
question
Computers and Technology, 23.02.2021 19:50