subject
Law, 05.05.2020 20:11 jahbreingram123

A Federal Covered Adviser registered with the SEC holds a meeting with its employees and verbally warns them about the prohibited practice of trading ahead of large customer orders that are likely to have a market impact. The firm has not yet included this prohibition in its policies and procedures manual, but intends to do so in the near future. Which statement is TRUE?A. There is no violation of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 "insider trading" rules because the employees participated in the meetingB. There is no violation of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 because the firm intends to include "trading ahead" restrictions in the next version of its policies and procedures manualC. The Investment Advisers Act of 1940 has been violated because the firm did not have written policies and procedures covering "front running" by its employeesD. There is no violation of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 because "front running" is not covered by the Act

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Law

question
Law, 03.07.2019 15:10
Before a case can be heard in a state high court, it must
Answers: 1
question
Law, 07.07.2019 02:10
At what part does suspect become classified as a defendant?
Answers: 1
question
Law, 07.07.2019 05:10
43. which lane position is the best for approaching a curve? a. 1 b. 2 c. 3 d. 4
Answers: 2
question
Law, 09.07.2019 19:20
3. meena and ala are two friends. meena has a habit of using new pens almostevery day, whereas ala believes in getting a refill for her pen instead of buyinga new pen even though her friends make fun of her.a) which out of two practices would you follow and why? b) which value is ala depicting?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
A Federal Covered Adviser registered with the SEC holds a meeting with its employees and verbally wa...
Questions
question
Health, 10.11.2020 20:10
question
Mathematics, 10.11.2020 20:10
question
Mathematics, 10.11.2020 20:10
question
Chemistry, 10.11.2020 20:10