subject
Law, 17.04.2020 00:43 barbie1salome

1 Point
Read this excerpt from the Supreme Court's Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
dissenting opinion:
The state educator's undeniable, and undeniably vital,
mandate to Å¿teach] moral and political values is not a
general warrant to act as "thought police" stifling
discussion of all but state-approved topics. ... Official
censorship of student speech on the ground that it
addresses "potentially sensitive topics" is...
impermissible. 5
A person who agrees with the dissenting opinion in this case would most
support which conclusion?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Law

question
Law, 03.07.2019 15:10
Before a case can be heard in a state high court, it must
Answers: 1
question
Law, 03.07.2019 18:10
What was the effect of the supreme court’s ruling in citizens united v. federal election commission? a. it removed limitations on corporate funding of political broadcasts. b. it removed all limits on campaign contributions by interest groups. c. it prohibited corporations and businesses from contributing to political campaigns. d. it prohibited interest groups from contributing to individual candidates.
Answers: 1
question
Law, 06.07.2019 06:20
Acash payment of $1 given to support a gift promise cannot support a contract. true false
Answers: 1
question
Law, 08.07.2019 06:10
How has naturalization made an impact or change in society, government, and the political process?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
1 Point
Read this excerpt from the Supreme Court's Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
dissenting opi...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 09.06.2021 15:20
question
English, 09.06.2021 15:20
question
Mathematics, 09.06.2021 15:20