A cyclist filed a negligence action in federal court in State A against a driver following an accident. After a jury of 12 persons returned a verdict for the cyclist, the presiding judge on her own motion, polled the jurors individually. The judge's polling revealed that the jury was not unanimous in
deciding that the cyclist had exercised due care and was not guilty of contributory negligence. As a result, the judge ordered a new trial. The cyclist then filed a timely notice of appeal.

Which, if any, of the following arguments would win on appeal?
The court of appeals should dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. (Civil Procedure-Appealability and Review)

no i don't think so.

explanation:

answer:

you should learn to recognize these eight warning signs for drowsy driving:

you keep yawning.

you are unable to keep your eyes open.

you catch yourself “nodding off” and have trouble keeping your head up.

you can’t remember driving the last few miles.

you end up too close to cars in front of you.

you miss road signs or drive past your turn.

you drift into the other lane of traffic.

you drift onto the “rumble strip” or onto the shoulder of the road.

answer:

yes, obviously. that violates r@pe and p*dophilia laws, which are some pretty serious laws if you ask me. and that is just nasty!

explanation:

who knows? not you apparently