jack, a careful driver with no history of heart disease, was legally driving along a highway at fifty miles per hour. suddenly, he had a massive heart attack. his car swerved into the oncoming lane; and diego, the driver of an approaching truck,
was severely injured in the crash. jack died soon after. is his estate liable to diego?

what is the rule of law?

Explanation:

First of all, I am not a lawyer. The question seems like asking you to argue one way or the other about liability of a injury claim against an estate. There is no specific law; except case laws which vary from state to state. I suggest you pick either yes or no and make your argument to support it.

"quid pro quo" harassment takes place when a supervisor requires sex, sexual favors, or sexual contact from an employee/job candidate as a condition of their employment. only supervisors who have the authority to make tangible employment actions (i.e. hire, fire, promote, can commit "quid pro quo" harassment.

answer:

they didn't want to get killed by the armed forces

explanation:

there was a lot of people there and some of the us armed forces had guns and they didn't want to die