If you were on a jury, do you think you would expect individual characteristics in the evidence? why or why not? what effects might it have if individuals expect to have individuals characteristics presented?

I'M NOT SURE I'D EXPECT INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS TO BE PRESENTED. IF THEY WERE, I KNOW IT'D DEFINITELY MAKE ME BELIEVE THE DEFENDANT IS GUILTY.

Explanation:

I THINK PHYSICAL EVIDENCE IS THE MOST USEFUL IN AN INVESTIGATION BECAUSE IT IS THE MOST BLACK AND WHITE OUT OF ALL THE TYPES OF EVIDENCE. IT'S ONE THING TO LISTEN TO A TESTIMONY OR LOOK AT DOCUMENTS, BUT IT'S ANOTHER THING TO HAVE THE SUSPECT'S DNA AT THE CRIME SCENE also,Individual characteristics are properties associated with a common source to a high degree of certainty. An example of an individual characteristic is the ridge characteristics of two fingerprint samples.

on june 23, 1972, the president signed title ix of the education amendments of 1972, 20 u.s.c. into law. title ix is a comprehensive federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded education program or activity.

answer:

polo g isn't a blood he lives in chicago

explanation:

so he ain't no blood