subject
History, 23.07.2019 17:00 dakotacsey03

Some historians believe that if stolypin had not been assassinated, and if his reforms had been given time, they might have prevented the unrest of 1916 and 1917. what might lead these historians to make this claim?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 02:00
How did the supreme court change as a result of ronald reagan's presidency? answers?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
Which of these did the soviet union do in 1961? it built a wall through berlin to keep people from moving to the west. it used force to destroy a wall the united states had built in berlin. it convinced the british and french to merge their zones in berlin with the soviet zone. it threatened to bomb berlin if the united states did not leave within 30 days.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
How did the us change it’s economy to provide supplies for the war effort?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:30
What did the french national assembly decide? peasants would only have to pay one-tenth of their earnings to the catholic church. the government could not legally charge taxes without first holding a vote. aristocrats would still receive special privileges as long as they paid a higher tax. employment would be available to all people, regardless of their social class.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Some historians believe that if stolypin had not been assassinated, and if his reforms had been give...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 11.03.2021 05:50
question
English, 11.03.2021 05:50
question
English, 11.03.2021 05:50