How did the supreme court ruling affect the cherokees? they were given control of their land, so they stayed. they were confident the court could stand up to the president. they were still removed by the government. they did not care about courts of the whites.

Even as the Supreme Court ruling prohibited it, Cherokees were still removed by the government.

Explanation:

The United States Supreme Court considered that Amerindian tribes were sovereign nations (Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 1831), and that state laws could not apply to these tribes (Worcester v. Georgia, 1832). President Jackson was deemed, probably wrongfully, to have responded to these convictions: "Marshall made a decision, so let him enforce it." But it is clear that he did not defend the tribes against the decisions of the different states.

The government first negotiated, but only a small part of the people concerned were ready to go hundreds of kilometers to settle on a reserve. It was the American army that finally led a real deportation of the Amerindians, with preliminary gatherings in forts, concentration in large camps and convoys.  

This deportation, particularly brutal, took place on forced marches. Thousands of Amerindians died throughout the course, especially among the Cherokee. This displacement became known as the Trail of Tears.

peasants’ war, (1524–25) peasant uprising in germany inspired by changes brought by the reformation, peasants in western and southern germany invoked   divine law to demand agrarian rights and freedom from oppression by nobles and landlords. as the uprising spread, some peasant groups organized armies. although the revolt was supported huldrych zwingli and thomas müntzerits condemnation by martain luther contributed to its defeat, principally by the army of the swabian league. some 100,000 peasants were killed. reprisals and increased restrictions discouraged further attempts to improve the peasants’ plight.

i think it would be " a" i might be wrong tho

martin luther king (1929-1968) was an activist for the african american rights, mr. king has a profile of a kind leader that built a tenacity, respect and full of hope future. he was an activist through civil disobedience and no violence pressure mechanisms. he tried to build a more egalitarian and fair society. his efforts carried a reivindication message of the civilian rights to every west corners. for that reason, he won the nobel prize in 1964.