Egypt’s recorded history began around 10,000 bc with the old kingdom (1). egyptians had developed a means of writing called hieroglyphics (3). hieroglyphics used pictographs to convey meaning (3). which critiques the factual accuracy of the summary?

The correct answer is B) while parts 2 and 3 are accurate, part one needs revision.

What critiques the factual accuracy of the summary is that while parts 2 and 3 are accurate, part one needs revision.

Historians considered that the formal settlement of people in the Egyptian territory started in 6000 BCE. But hieroglyph script developed around 3200 BCE. So Egypt’s recorded history did not begin around 10,000 BC with the Old Kingdom but around 3200 BCE. The statements that are true are "Egyptians had developed a means of writing called hieroglyphics" and "Hieroglyphics used pictographs to convey meaning." So parts 2 and 3 are accurate, part one needs revision.

The other options of the question were A) while part 1 is accurate, part 2 and 3 need revision, C) while parts 1 and 2 are accurate, part 3 needs revision. And D) while part 3 is accurate, parts 1 and 2 need revision.

john smith was the first englishman to sail around the world. francis bacon served as attorney general and lord chancellor of england. he took up aristotelian ideas, arguing for an empirical, inductive approach, known as the scientific method, which is the foundation of modern scientific inquiry.

southerners, for their part, considered brown a terrorist. they felt threatened by northerners' deification of brown and worried about the potential for other, similar armed insurrections.

explanation: