What conclusion can readers draw about this society vs. nature conflict? society has remained unaware of nature’s power. society has become overwhelmed by nature. society has proven its resilience against nature. society has demonstrated its respect for nature.

If this was the missing data:
Read the excerpt from part 1 of Zeitoun.

In the neighborhood, other homes had been hit by all manner of debris. Windows had been blown out. Wet, black branches covered cars, the street. Everywhere trees had been pulled out of the earth and lay flat.

The quiet was profound. The wind rippled the water but otherwise all was silent. No cars moved, no planes flew. A few neighbors stood on their porches or waded through their yards, assessing damage. No one knew where to start or when.

MY ANSWER IS: 
SOCIETY HAS BECOME OVERWHELMED BY NATURE.

In every natural calamity we face, we prepare ourselves for any contingencies. However, there are instances when our preparation is not enough and the natural calamity is too much for us to handle that we become overwhelmed with the enormity of what we are facing with.

hi there!

question - in the 1900s there were two competing views about the environment that often pitted industrialist and conservationist against one another. how were these two competing views demonstrated by the environmental policies of president roosevelt and president taft?

theodore had a quicked tempered personality while president taft was shy and barely noticable.theodore had started a dealing service with big companies which president taft completed.both were into making sure workers were always safe.president taft took the presidency more serious than theodore did.both loved to save nature.

hope this : )