In the case of schenck v. united states the supreme court ruled that.. a. the espionage act was unconstitutional. b. charles schenck had been falsely accused. c. speech aimed to potentially create danger could be banned. d. the first amendment had no limits.

C. speech aimed to potentially create danger could be banned.

Explanation:

Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer were two socialists who circulated pamphlets urging disobedience through peaceful action from the public because they understood that the draft during World War I infringed the Thirteenth Amendment ban on involuntary servitude. They were convicted of violating the Espionage Act of 1917 by trying to create insubordination, and they appealed claiming that the Espionage Act violated the First Amendment. However, in Schenck v. United States (1919), the Court stated that it was a proper application of Congress’ wartime authority.

when a country suffers, for example, a drought period, the market product is affected for a low offer, in this case, potatoes; the government has to tax to the households, which have to give more money for the potatoes which they consume, that situation make them consume substitute goods even through loans, it could increase the financial market movement and the inflationary phenomena, the business has to increase salaries in order to the employees could buy a more expensive food (potatoes) and in order to inflation tha business had to buy expensive supplies in the factor market, while the rest of the world have to gain more money to consume the same amount of potatoes.

a memoir is the correct answer