How was the judiciary act of 1789 a compromise between federalists and anti-federalists?

It held state legislation in place but granted federal courts the ability to modify state judgments, is the right answer.

Explanation:

The Judiciary Act of 1789 was a federal ordinance of the United States approved on 24th September 1789, in the inaugural session of the First Congress of the U.S. This statute set the federal court of the U.S.  Section 1 of the Third Article of U.S. Constitution, commanded that the "legal authority of the U.S, will be in in the hands of the Supreme Court, and such subordinate Courts" as Congress saw fitted to place.

ur mom

explanation:

1) checks and balances- this idea is implemented in the constitution to ensure that no one branch of the federal government gains too much power. for example, the legislative branch(congress) can approve a bill that will then be sent to the executive branch (president). if the president does not like the bill or thinks that it violates the rights of citizens, he/she can veto the bill. vetoing the bill stops the bill from becoming a law. this check on power ensures that congress makes laws that do not violate the rights of citizens.

2) anti-federalists do not want to ratify the constitution unless it includes a bill of rights. the anti-federalists are worried that the constitution gives too much power to the federal government. having a strong central government caused problems when the us was still part of great britain. this is why the anti-federalists are fearful of this type of system.

3) federalists want a new constitution passed because it will fix america's weak political structure. before the us constitution is implemented, the constitution being used is known as the articles of confederation. this constitution has an extremely weak central government, allowing for disunity among the states.

can't do the whole thing, hope this