Which most effectively describes how changing from a hunter-gatherer society to an agricultural society affected early human development 1.) at the onset of the agricultural revolution, early humans developed new social cultures and established rules 2.) at the onset of the agricultural revolution, early human anatomy change to bipedalism and improved locomotion 3.) at the onset of the agricultural revolution, early humans change to a strict protein-based diet of animal meat 4.) at the onset of the agricultural revolution, early humans developed steel tools to be used in plowing fields

1) at the onset of the agricultural revolution, early humans developed new social cultures and established rules.

Explanation:

This is the answer that best describes how changing from a hunter-gatherer society to an agricultural society affected early human development. When agriculture was adopted by early humans, people were able to become sedentary. This meant that villages and towns were established, and the population increased. Rules were established in order to regulate behaviour among these large groups of people. Moreover, isolation and the division of labour led to the development of new cultures which were distinct of other social groups in different geographical locations.

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n:

omg i dont know oops sorry