Which of the following best explains the federalists' view on including a list of rights in the constitution? a. the constitution already limited powers of government, so a list was not needed. b. the government would not be able to enforce penalties against those violating rights. c. a bill of rights would threaten the freedom of any people not included in the list. d. a bill of rights would weaken a government that needed to be strong to function.

A. The Constitution already limited powers of government, so a list was not needed.

Explanation:

During the debates for ratification of the proposed Constitution, Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a list of rights, because it already established enumerated powers to the government, and the government was limited to them. Furthermore, they argued that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary because the government was founded under the principles of Separation of Powers and the Checks and Balances system, under which the power of the government had to be divided into three branches and each branch was allowed to oversee, check and limit the other so no part abuse from its power.

as the person below or above me i agree   the tone of voice of the itnerview can very well influecne he or she to pick one more over that   the infleuncer would pick

the is the answer a