Using the newspaper, news magazines, or the internet, learn which groups of people are working in the area of human rights. make a list of five of the groups in america that are working for certain rights and identify these rights. are they working for "new" rights, or to have existing civil rights laws enforced better? how are their efforts similar to or different from the efforts of america's founders? what methods have they used? how effective have their efforts been so far? then, write a 350 word report based on your research. in your report, show how you recognize the difference between cause and effect and a mere sequence of historical events. plz im doomed

The NAACP- The primary focus of the NAACP continues to be the protection and enhancement of the civil rights of African Americans and other minorities.

The National Council of La Raza- The National Council of La Raza (NCLR) is a private, nonprofit, nonpartisan, tax-exempt organization established in 1968 to reduce poverty and discrimination, and improve life opportunities for Hispanic Americans.

National Gay and Lesbian Task Force- NGLTF is the national progressive organization working for the civil rights of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered people, with the vision and commitment to building a powerful political movement.

Native American Rights Fund-The Native American Rights Fund mission is the preservation of tribal existence, the protection of tribal natural resources, the promotion of human rights, the accountability of governments, the development of Indian law and educating the public about Indian rights, laws, and issues.

Anti-Defamation League- The Lawyers Division is a group of prominent New York lawyers, committed to realization of the objectives and policy goals of the ADL. Their mission is as follows: To stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment to all citizens alike.

This is all i have hope this helps :)

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!