Washington and monroe believed the united states should not become involved in european affairs. is it possible to follow the same policy today? why or why not? cite examples of recent news events to support your opinion. i said it's not possible, but i need recent news events to support my opinion and i don't know any.

I think that it is still marginally conceivable to follow the principles of the Monroe Doctrine. Nowadays, Europe has not been bothering the United States, except for the guidance of their very abundant views. Times have changed, they are no longer isolated from Europe because of a supervisory king. They need to entomb the past and become associates with any possible supporters, because they may need them someday. This also includes not meddling with their governments and countries unless it is completely essential.  

i normally just use

answer: both considered peasants valued members of society.

explanation: the ancient chinese and indian empires were large asian empires that had the same problems with other big empires, they had to work hard and sometimes fight in order to keep them united, they both relied heavily on their capacity to trade and to send strange and rare items to europe, and had the father as the head of the house hold in both societies, but they didn´t considered pleasants as valued members of their society, they were the bottom of the social pyramid in both of their societies.