subject
History, 18.07.2019 12:40 mlbowman3644

In the dred scott case, the supreme court decided a. the missouri compromise was illegal because it was illegal for congress to deprive a slave owner of property (slaves) without the due process of law. b. the compromise of 1850 was illegal because it was illegal for congress to deprive a slave owner of property (slaves) without the due process of law. c. the missouri compromise was illegal because it was illegal for congress to deprive a slave of his or her freedom if they lived in the south. d. the missouri compromise was illegal because it freed slaves in the slave states

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 18:50
Which product would have been most likely to have been traded in this area at this time?
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:00
Why were colonial assemblies created and what did they do
Answers: 3
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
What clause of the treaty of versailles in particular left the germans feeling like they were “stabbed in the back? ” by the victors?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
Turkey a: nato b: warsaw pact c: not a member of either alliance
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
In the dred scott case, the supreme court decided a. the missouri compromise was illegal because it...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 21.11.2019 02:31
question
Computers and Technology, 21.11.2019 02:31