Which lists the steps involved in approving the constitution in the correct order? a- i. the constitution was sent to the states for a vote. ii. states voted on whether to approve the constitution. iii. nine of the thirteen original states had to approve it. iv. the constitution became law. b- i. the constitution was sent to congress for a vote. ii. congress voted on whether to approve the constitution. iii. two-thirds of congressional representatives had to approve it. iv. the constitution became law. c- i. the constitution was sent to the states for a vote. ii. states voted on whether to approve the constitution. iii. all of the original states had to approve it. iv. the constitution became law. d- i. the constitution was sent to congress for a vote. ii. congress voted on whether to approve the constitution. iii. three-fourths of congressional representatives had to approve it. iv. the constitution became law.

The correct answer is A) i. The Constitution was sent to the states for a vote. ii. States voted on whether to approve the Constitution. iii. Nine of the thirteen original states had to approve it. iv. The Constitution became law.

The lists of steps involved in approving the Constitution in the correct order is "i. The Constitution was sent to the states for a vote. ii. States voted on whether to approve the Constitution. iii. Nine of the thirteen original states had to approve it. iv. The Constitution became law."

During the Constitutional Convention of September 17, 1787, signed the Constitution in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Now, the Constitution had to be ratified by at least nine states. On December 7, 1787, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Delaware, and New Jersey ratified the Constitution. Then, Massachusetts, South Carolina, and Maryland followed. Finally, on June 21, 1788, New Hampshire ratified the Constitution. It was the ninth state needed.

idk

explanation:

martin luther king (1929-1968) was an activist for the african american rights, mr. king has a profile of a kind leader that built a tenacity, respect and full of hope future. he was an activist through civil disobedience and no violence pressure mechanisms. he tried to build a more egalitarian and fair society. his efforts carried a reivindication message of the civilian rights to every west corners. for that reason, he won the nobel prize in 1964.