The three-fifths compromise was an agreement at the constitutional convention, which stated that in calculating population for state representation
a. a slave counted as three-fifths of a human being
b. women only counted as three-fifths of a person
c. only three-fifths of a state’s population was allowed to be slaves
d. only landowning citizens counted as a full person; all others counted as three-fifths of a person

A: a slave was counted as three-fifths of a human being

This agreement was reached in 1787 in Philadelphia during a Convention.

Hopefully this helped and good luck

b) a state law could be declared illegal if it contradicted the constitution.

explanation:

the conflict of this case originated when james w. mcculloch, a cashier of the baltimore branch of the second bank of the united states that the congress had chartered in 1816, refused to pay a tax imposed by the maryland state.

in the case, the state of maryland appealed that the establishment of a second bank was unconstitutional since the constitution didn't say anything about granting that power to congress. however, the case determined that even if such right wasn't specifically stated in the constitution, it was part of the "implied powers" of the government enunciated in article i, section 8.

the case also eliminated maryland's legislation to impose taxes to a national bank, asserting that even though the states retained the power of taxation, the constitution's laws are supreme and can not be controlled by the states, therefore, if a state law contradicts the constitution, it should be declared illegal.

explanation:

increases in demand are shown by a shift to the right in the demand curve. this could be caused by a number of factors, including a rise in income, a rise in the price of a substitute or a fall in the price of a complement.

which the answer is:

b