How did Daniel Webster and John Calhoun differ in their opinions about state government? Webster believed that the state governments were given many powers by the Constitution, while
Calhoun believed states had limited powers based on the Constitution.
Webster believed that the state governments voluntarily entered into an agreement with the federal
government, while Calhoun believed that the agreement was forced upon the states.
О.
Webster believed that the state governments had no say over federal laws, but Calhoun believed that
states had the right to ignore federal laws.
Webster believed that the state governments lacked any rights, while Calhoun believed that state
governments had rights that the federal government granted to them.