subject
History, 29.01.2022 19:50 exoticbunnylover123

In the case of Dred Scott vs Sandford what was the ultimate decision? A. Dred Scott would be free but had to return to Missouri for trial.
B. Dred Scott would be freed after a certain period of enslavement.
C. Dred Scott would remain a slave because he didn’t have the right to bring trial.
D. Dred Scott would be a free man because he was living in free territory.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 15:20
Which is the best example of a primary source ducument useful in the study of history ?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:40
(05.04 mc) how did the roman transportation system keep the empire strong? plz
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:00
Which of the following problems did shays rebellion show about the articles of confederation? a. there was no federal standing army b. states couldn’t create their own tax laws c. the federal government imposed too many taxes on states d. there was too much federal regulation of interstate commerce
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
John locke viewed the social contract as a choice or "consent of the governed", where the people possess the power to change government. how did thomas hobbes see the social contract? man is born in chains, but can be set free through good deeds. man is born happy, but becomes more miserable as he ages. man is born poor, but can rely on other individuals for security. man is born selfish, but can give up some freedom in return for security provided by the government.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
In the case of Dred Scott vs Sandford what was the ultimate decision? A. Dred Scott would be free...
Questions
question
World Languages, 27.06.2019 09:30
question
Computers and Technology, 27.06.2019 09:30