Write an essay that explains your position on Seward's Proposal Imagine you are a member of Congress in 1867 and debating William Seward's proposal for the purchase of Alaska. You are asked to explain how you plan to vote on the proposal. Prepare a speech of 350 words explaining either your support for or opposition to the proposal. Thoroughly explain and justify your support for or opposition to the purchase. Use proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation as you write your speech. Note: Be sure to write your speech as if you are a member of Congress in 1867, not someone who lives in the present day.

Which progressive reform was least related to the causes and effects of world war i? o legislation limiting the use of child labor o establishing 8-hour workdays for railroad workers o reducing tariffs on imported goods o expanding women's rights and the right to vote

Which of the following events happen during president hardings term? a) the supreme court decided to break up large corporations. b) the supreme court strength and state laws protection labor union. c) the supreme court ruled in favor of extended regulations of child labor. d)the supreme court made it easier for large businesses to operate.

Hin t in the section titled, "what can be done? " of "battling the digital jolly roger," what is one of the problems caused by piracy that the author lists? he section titled, "what can be done? " of "battling the digital jolly roger," what is one of the problems caused by piracy that the author lists? ow does the writer's point of view in "the completely free market" affect the credibility of the article? a. it's written in the third person, which allows the author to examine all sides of the debate. b. since it's written in the first person, it doesn't objectively present all sides of the argument. c. since it's written in the second person, it puts the reader in the writer's position, and gives the reader more to consider from this perspective. d. it's written in the first person, but is conducted as an interview with several different sources, providing a full-circle debate.