Part B Reference your notes and the provided documents to write a three- to four-paragraph essay that describes how these two historical documents form their respective arguments. Compare and contrast the key points, main ideas, and arguments presented in the documents. Make sure your essay addresses the following questions: What techniques do the authors use to form their arguments? Is there any evidence of bias or stereotypes? Using the author-date system, make sure to cite your sources properly with in-text citations as well as a works cited page for any information you use from outside sources, including the two provided documents. When you have finished, reread the essay to check for all of the points above, and then proofread it to be sure your work does not contain errors in grammar or spelling.

answer: born in saint-dié, in the vosges department, france, he studied law, and was called to the bar at paris in 1854,[2] but soon went into politics, contributing to various newspapers, particularly to le temps. he attacked the second french empire with great violence, directing his opposition especially against baron haussmann, prefect of the seine department. a series of his articles in le temps was later republished as the fantastic tales of haussmannlaxupa (1868).[2]

explanation:

answer:

won re-nomination with no opposition he also had the support of his party

explanation:

it saw incumbent president andrew jackson, candidate of the democratic party, defeat henry clay, candidate of the national republican party. jackson won re-nomination with no opposition, and the 1832 democratic national convention replaced vice president john c. calhoun with martin van buren.