Question 32 Which summarizes the Supreme Court's ruling on the Dred Scott case?
A
The Supreme Court ruled against the institution of slavery and it angered Southernors
B
The Supreme Court ruled newly admitted states would be able to decide on the issue of slavery themselves.
с
The Supreme Court ruled that any slaves taken to a free state would lose their slave status and receive their freedom
D
The Supreme Court ruled that blackpooplo, regardless of status, free or slave, do not have the right to suo anyone or any stato because they do not have citizenship
C2021 Illuminate Education, Inc.
O
hp

Explanation:

B, because in 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision.

hehe hehe hehe he he hehe hehe hehe hehe

answer: both considered peasants valued members of society.

explanation: the ancient chinese and indian empires were large asian empires that had the same problems with other big empires, they had to work hard and sometimes fight in order to keep them united, they both relied heavily on their capacity to trade and to send strange and rare items to europe, and had the father as the head of the house hold in both societies, but they didn´t considered pleasants as valued members of their society, they were the bottom of the social pyramid in both of their societies.