Today, supporters of free trade defend it as the policy that best represents the public interest. Yet in the early years of the nation, high tariffs were widely accepted as best for the nation even though they restricted trade. What are the arguments in favor of free trade versus restrictions on trade? Do the advocates of restrictions on free trade always favor narrow special interests or do they favor the greater public interest? Does President Trump's use of tariffs, for example, against Chinese steel, help or hurt America's interests?

1. they could both use a veto to cancel an action.

2. women couldn't vote in the roman republic but could in the united states

the fact that could also be added to column b is that during world war ii, specifically between the years 1941 and 1945, japan expanded its territory towards the indonesian territory in what was known later as part of the "pacific war". in that time, japan could conquer the philipines, singapore,   borneo, central java, malang, cebu, sumatra and various other islands of the area, therefore expanding its territory for a brief period of time.

the answer should be founding brothers. i hope i you!

your answer is 1930's

explanation

this is just around the time the great depression was starting and putting the us ecnomy into ecnomic failure causing the goverment to take a much larger rule to try and pieace it back together