How did John Winthrop change the government for massachusetts?

SEE EXPLANATION:

Explanation:

John Winthrop was the leader of the Massachusetts migration. A famous quote of his influenced the government of Massachusetts, and this quote is: "We shall be as a city upon a hill, the eyes of all people are upon us."

The extended version is "We shall be as a city upon a hill, the eyes of all people are upon us; so that if we shall deal falsely with our God in this work we have undertaken and so cause him to withdraw his present help from us, we shall be made a story and a by-word through the world."

This refers to the fact that England's eyes (and those of the settlers) will be on Massachusetts and that they must preform well and set a good example of what a colony should be, basically.

John Winthrop wanted to create a religious haven (specifically a Puritan haven from what I have learned) and this influenced the government to strive for religious freedom.

Not only that, John Winthrop served as a governor of Massachusetts, so this practically a direct influence.

“a committee reviews the bill and marks it up to make it more viable and to reflect interests 

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is