How did the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists view the Constitution differently? A. Federalists believed that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary, while Anti-Federalists believed that a Bill of Rights was needed to protect citizens.

B. Federalists believed that the Constitution should be as weak as the Articles of Confederation, while Anti-Federalists believed the Constitution needed to give the national government more power.

C. Federalists believed that the Constitution would set up another monarchy, while the Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution had checks and balances to keep it from becoming too powerful.

D. Federalists believed that state governments should maintain power over the national government, while Anti-Federalists believed that states should be weaker than the national government.

I think it's D

Explanation:

Anti-federalists believed that the Constitution would develop into a monarchy, meaning it would be too powerful, while the federalists had the opposite view.

D

Explanation:

i really really really really really really dont know

atman means 'eternal self'. the atman refers to the real self beyond ego or false self. it is often referred to as 'spirit' or 'soul' and indicates our true self or essence which underlies our existence.

there are many interesting perspectives on the self in hinduism ranging from the self as eternal servant of god to the self as being identified with god. the understanding of the self as eternal supports the idea of reincarnation in that the same eternal being can inhabit temporary bodies.

the idea of atman entails the idea of the self as a spiritual rather than material being and thus there is a strong dimension of hinduism which emphasises detachment from the material world and promotes practices such as asceticism. thus it could be said that in this world, a spiritual being, the atman, has a human experience rather than a human being having a spiritual experience.

explanation: