subject
History, 17.10.2021 01:40 reyne36

A) Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both Shaw v. Reno and Easley v. Cromartie. b) Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts elucidated in Easley v. Cromartie might have led to a different holding than the holding in Shaw v. Reno (Hint: think politics in Easly and race in Shaw as predominant factors in drawing district lines and violation of the Equal Protection clause).

c) Describe an action that members of the public who disagree with the holding in Easley v. Cromartie could take to limit its impact (hint: if you think there was a racial focus, what could you do to limit the impact of the decision? protest, campaign contributions, voting, elections, support interest groups, political parties, public media campaign, lawsuits, new SC justices, constitutional amendment for redistricting, etc)

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 18:30
How did the location of islamic lands make cultural diffusion possible
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
Which number shows the location of the united kingdom of great britain?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:40
What was the compromise that allowed california to be admitted to the union
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:30
How did the love and black elite gain financial security during the antebellum period
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
A) Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both Shaw v. Reno and Easley v. Cromartie....
Questions
question
English, 14.10.2019 22:00