subject
History, 08.10.2021 19:50 59279

Thomas Paine' Common Sense (1) In the following pages I offer more than simple facts, Plain argume and common sense…I have heard it asserted (claimed] by some that, as America has flourished under her former connection with Great Britain, the same connection is necessary towards her future happiness, and will always have the same effect. Nothing can be more fallacious [untrue] than this kind of argument. “We may as well assert that, because a child has thrived upon milk, it is never to have meat, or that the first twerry
years of our lives is to become a precedent [model) for the next
twenty.” But even this is admitting more than is true. For I answer
roundly that America would have flourished as much, and probably much more, had no European power taken any notice of her. The
commerce by which she hath enriched herself are the necessaries of life, and will always have a market while eating is the
custom of Europe.

1.) What is Thomas Paine's reaction to this argument?
2.) Who is the child paine is talking about in the in paragraph one
3.) What is the meaning of this quote

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 17:30
Which of the following governments is the most unrealistic for the people the dynasty government the confucian government the mauryan government he legalistic government
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
List of social classes of the shang dynasty in order ?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
Pls quickly! which of the following statements about spanish plantations is not accurate? a. spanish plantation screw sugarcane for export to spain. b. the spanish had a little concern for the lives of the indians who worked on the plantations. c. spanish presentation grew a wide variety of crops and sent the produce to many different european countries. d. to replace the native americans our dying off the spanish important african slaves.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 13:50
Imagine instead that angel raich and diane monson were arrested at a pro-medical marijuana rally they had organized in a public park in california and faced several charges: 1. violating a public decency statute because they were wearing t-shirts that read "ignore the feds, weed is not a crime! " with pictures of marijuana leaves surrounded by flames and guns, and 2. violating a town regulation that prohibited being in the park after sunset. raich and monson argue that both charges should be dropped because their actions were protected by the first amendment. 1. what is raich and monson's argument that they should be allowed to wear their t shirts 2. what is raich and monson's argument that they should be allowed to organize a rally in a public park? 3. what is the weakness is raich and monson's argument about the rally?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Thomas Paine' Common Sense (1) In the following pages I offer more than simple facts, Plain argume...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 19.07.2019 21:30