Imagine the following scenario: A famous American university has just published a highly regarded paper, which reveals that “knowledge is impossible.” The paper reveals that there is no way for people to learn and also no way for any person to truly know anything for certain. You are the US Secretary of Education, and you must create a public response to this very problematic publication. Using the philosophical theories of metaphysical and empiricist philosophers, create an essay response to this publication. Be sure to address any effect it could have on our educational system or on government support for research.

id say bottom left to top top left to bottom right and middle to middle

explanation:

during the debate over his landmark energy policy proposal, president jimmy carter failed to consult one of the most powerful senators, louisiana’s russell long, who would have a big say over whether the legislation moved through the upper chamber. this was classic carter. with a strong distaste for congressional politics, the president simply refused to do what most other presidents would consider routine, such as courting key senators. long became so irate with the president that when he was finally invited to a white house dinner, he stood up to ask a question and, before doing so, proceeded to sarcastically introduce himself: “i’m russell long, chairman of the senate finance committee.”

this interaction is a revealing moment in stuart e. eizenstat’s fascinating new history of carter’s presidency. the former peanut farmer from georgia was a president who, according to conventional wisdom, didn’t care much for party politics; nonetheless, in eizenstat’s view, carter’s legacy on domestic and foreign policy has been vastly underappreciated. the author paints carter as a “bold and determined” leader who bravely attacked the challenges of his time. eizenstat goes so far as to argue that carter might very well be the most successful one-term president in american history.

i think the answer is d