Identify which colonies each characteristics describes: New England, the Chesapeake, and the Lowcountry. Check all that apply. -Difficult for slaves to create settled communities -Slaves ran own gardens and farms
-Regional economy centered cash crops

Explanation:

The New England colonies: The New England Colonies were flat along the rocky coastlines, which made good harbours. It became hilly and mountainous further inland. The land was covered in dense forests. The soil was rocky, which made farming difficult.

Chesapeake: Both the Chesapeake and southern colonies had rich soil and temperate climates which made large-scale plantation farming possible. Both regions had an agriculture-based economy in which cash crops like tobacco, indigo, and cotton were cultivated for trade.

Lowcountry: From the seventeenth to the ninteenth century, Charleston and the surrounding Carolina Low country region epitomized a slave society.Cash crops produced through enslaved labor, particularly Carolina Gold Rice, made Lowcountry planters some of the wealthiest and most influential individuals in North America.

i thing that the best option is a.they feared it would cause a second economic collapse.

one of the most negatives aspects of the new deal was that it upset the balanced federal budget and led to a huge deficit for the nation while at the same time failed to end increasing unemployment. roosevelt's program, based on keynesian theories of economics, called for massive government spending to stimulate the economy. as he   failed to do this with large tax increases; large sums of money were borrowed to fund new deal programs. when the economy showed some improvement, roosevelt was concerned about inflation, and ordered cuts in government spending. unfortunately, he did so at a time when the new social security tax had cut people's disposable income. businesses were too afraid of spending, and the economy in 1937 was in worse shape than in 1929. at the end of that year, two million people were unemployed.

polling is a process and the outcome is not involved in the process itself.

the outcome, which is an unfavorable rating for a particular candidate is not affected by the mechanical process of polling.

it rather depends on the number of people voting in favor of the candidate.

this is an outcome of people's preferences.